Tryptophan Dan Meets Cat-eatin Dave

A song called “Wang Dang Doodle” off the definitive Howlin’ Wolf collection got me to thinking about atime in college when we were coming up with our hobo names. In the song are several Blues names.

There are a ton of name generators out there. They can tell you your porn star name, your Jedi name, or your hobo name I suppose. There are others that will help to realistically–if such a word can be applied–invent names for characters in your speculative fiction. They amuse me, but I’ve never used one for the names I come up with her or the names I’ve used elsewhere.

My process is likely to generate same sounding names, but I’ve not really worked it over too hard for a comfortable balance between familiar and different nor have a significantly stressed the volumes needed for epic fantasy. I ain’t worried.

The sound of the word is important to me. The other night I wanted an X. So I riffed from there. For me a word has to look the way it sounds and sound the way it looks. I’m not likely to pull anything Celtic-like out of my book of tricks.

Sometimes I pick a letter or a word form and mouth it over and over. Other times I might take existing words and invert the order. If I do that I normally tweak it so that it isn’t a recognizably backward word. Replace a phoneme or a same sound letter. I like taking the front an back letters off recognizable words too. I think it helps a reader feel at home with the word without knowing why: Ailchas and Iffan are my best examples.

Anyhow, “Tryptophan Dan” popped into my head tonight. Maybe that’s a post-genetic apocalypse name. I can’t imagine tryptophan becoming all that recognizable without some sort of genetic upheaval.

I don’t recall what my hobo name was. I think I know someone that would recall. His name was “Cat-eating Dave”

Word count: 323
Day 186

Coining Femininityism

Somewhere here in the next couple years it’s going to be time for me to write a children’s book. Or rather, a series of children’s books destined to become wildly popular for both their authenticity and their unabashed look at femininityism.

We have four daughters. People ask if we were trying for a boy. My response is usually, “No, we were trying for puppies.” This masks my annoyance that somehow I could (maybe should) be disappointed by my children’s gender. It’s also just polite because, really, those folks are just making small talk and when you have four of anything in a row it does spark a certain trend in the conversation.

“You’re really going to have your hands full in a few years.” WTF? Like I don’t already? Seriously, it’s the head count that chafes not all the X chromosomes.

Anyhow, back to me writing that book. I should write a few. Maybe go Wattersonesque on you guys with four sharp as a whip, wise beyond their years, snarky, but distinct girls that each tote around a rag doll that turns into an Amazon Warrior, Queen, Muse, or Scientist as the situations warrant. Or something more Lewisian with a lion and a closet. Or I could find some LCD and try a Carolinian trip of some kind. No worries I couldn’t and wouldn’t and shouldn’t and wontn’t go Geisel.

No really, back to the book thing.

I’ve poked around at some fairy thing a few months back. Maybe I could expand that into a more substantial vehicle. Right now they are all at such disparate developmental stages that will blur quickly with age. Has anyone ever written something interesting with four kids under five? Talk about difficult voices to develop.

Hmmmm.

In case you were wondering “femininityism” is a cross between what my ignorant brain knows of femininity and feminism. Think CEO with a ponytail or “Who the hell asked you if I look fat in this, but do I?”

Word count: 325
Day 177