Unpromtped

I’m not a fan of writing prompts because I don’t find them compelling.  All prompts are contrived.  An anonymous composer, should I say contriver, distilled a a drop or two of essence from a particularly rewarding writing session.  They packaged it as a question or situation or evocative eliptical.  That half-teaspoon of muse soaked into the page of a student writing workbook or a random generator on the Internet.  Here is sits before me.

Why the hell should this matter to me?  Obviously I wipe it away before I begin typing.

Wait.  A real writer, a professional writer, could compose a 1000 words from any featureless request.  Couldn’t they?  Shouldn’t I at least try?

In High School I tried because I didn’t have a choice.  Mr. Brainard—he said he could see me becoming a pro—gave us a prompt and expected results before the end of the hour.  He didn’t grade on quantity or quality or creativity.  I’m sure he prised those things, but he didn’t mark against a lack of any of those.  He marked against nothing.  He didn’t grade on the relationship to the prompt either.  As I recall, at least once I refused the prompt and wrote what I wanted to write.

As I write this, it comes to mind that writing to a prompt gave me the freedom not to worry over the output.  I blamed the prompt for uninteresting results.

Still, I find it difficult to treat prompts as if they were a workout, a training regimine.  Prompts don’t parallel free throws and layups as much as they do a game of HORSE.  I guess shooting more baskets is better than shooting less regardless of the scenario, but adding nine other guys to the court, a second basket, a ref, and a time clock is not a linear progression of difficulty.

This week I’ll work from prompts despite my thin enthusiasm for them.  I will try really really hard not to waste my time clicking through the bad ones to find less bad ones hoping to find good ones.

http://writingfix.com/classroom_tools/dailypromptgenerator.htm

Day 263

Giants are to Elephants as Humans are to:

This post marks my two week hiatus from Q10.  Lets see if the distraction-free environment effects my writing.

So.  Giants?

Let me disregard cultural elements of giants and humans and return to the physicality of it all (write the word one more time and I’ll not be certain of it’s definition any more).  I suspect that I’ll not be able to separate such things much longer, but I’d like to build from what I feel is the easy part.

Currently, I’m operating from an all else remains the same perspective.  Trees, dogs, cows, rivers, grass, lakes, ocean waves, whales, lions, icebergs, rain, rocks, and elephants all stay the same size.  Giants are just bigger humans, not lumbering, not stupid, not less in any way.  This makes things odd.

Giants won’t necessarily feel dwarfed by a tree.  Won’t find forests daunting for their size.  I think a giant would react similarly to how humans react to bushes and bushwhacking.  They’d find them annoyingly in their faces and frustrating to traverse.  As a building material wood might not be a first choice.

Dogs are going to be cute, but not appealing or useful as companions.  Same with cats—not that they are useful.  Imagine not having a pet or no one you know having a pet.  A panting id with no ego you could guiltlessly confide in.

Humans rely heavily on cows and cattle for food, but how would a giant feel about them?  Their really more snack sized than meal sized.  Probably giants would have a relationship similar to ours with chicken.  But what fills the spot for cows?  Buffalo aren’t big enough.  Hippo, rhino, and elephant have got to be tough.  Maybe giants wouldn’t have killed off mastadons?

I doubt many rivers and no smaller streams would give a giant much pause.  This seems to be one of the things that would diminish exponentially in terms of perception rather than linearly with my 4x rule.  Sure large rivers would be difficult to traverse, but I doubt many would be impossible.  Many rivers commonly twarting human progress would be jumpable or trod without getting one’s shirt wet if you were 25 feet tall.

The weekly growtrh of grass wouldn’t even register in a giant’s world.  Even most tall grass would be ignorable or amusing.  Lawn care in general takes on a bonsai tree sort of feel.

Lakes.  Here I think we have an easily scalable geographic feature.  Most interactions with lakes would be nearly identical to our own.  I’ll have to think about boating though.  Tying logs together to create a raft might not be somehting a giant would redily consider.  Would you be willing to ride a raft made of broomstick handles?

As a young teen I recall getting swept under a Pacific wave and being ground into the sand.  Not having ever been to the ocean it terrified me.  Most waves would be inconsiderable to a giants.  I suppose this relationship would be like that of lakes.  I think it would be less equivalent though.

Shit I didn’t initially mean to turn that list into a working list.

Whales might be an excellent source of food or even companionship for a coastal tribe of giants.  While dolphins would be food.

What would even be able to successfully predate a giant?  A pack of lions could take a lone giant down but I don’t know if they’d bother.  Would lions be the same as cats are to humans.  I doubt they domesticate well.  There’s more to explore regarding predation though.  What’s it like to really really be at the top of that chain?

Icebergs would be the same.  Exact same.

Rain would be 4x less annoying.  It might even qualify for exponentially less annoying.  Though I can see it being an equivalency as well.  Rain gets as close to tempurature as I put on the list.  I wonder if a giant—made of the same materials—would react any different to tempurature differences.  Seems like they would be happier in the cold because of their need to dissapate heat from their core.  Their skin though wouldn’t be impervious to changes though since it’s just skin.

Screw rocks.  They scale.

Aside from whales elephants would be the only animal to match well with a giant’s scale.  Since whale swim I think there would still be useful mysteries that keep them at a distance, but not elephants.  I think elephants might even successfully replace dogs as companions.  Or food.

That was fun and will become my longest post ever I imagine.

Feeling Like a Teenage Chemist

It appears that writing creatively with plot and characters and all that mess is not primarily how Giant Week is going down.

Yesterday, between that morning’s post and this morning’s post, highway workers installed tens of signs on the overpasses.  These sign indicate the minimum height of the opening under the overpass.  I have no idea how they did this all in between my trip on Monday night and my trip out on Wednesday, but a big thanks goes out to them.  These signs certainly came in handy for estimating purposes regarding all my giant questions from yesterday.

It looks like most gaps were 17 feet with the elevated roadway and safety wall making for another 5 feet.  At 22 feet overall I think I’m safe in saying that many 4x giants would be able to peer over the wall with ease and that climbing from one to the next would not be out of the question for most.  However, considering overpasses aren’t usually spanning huge distances a giant would be more inclined to just walk on up where the overpass runs into the bank.

The bridge issue resolved, I moved on to the lamp post thing.  Near as I can tell a 4x giant changing the lamp in a streetlamp would be like me changing one in the ceiling of my home: he or she would rather have a step stool.  Though maybe they just wouldn’t be that high because giants would be employed to change them out?

Now that I’ve sorted out my initial foray into the physicality of giants I have been drifting into the culture.  This is tough.  Twining the cultures of man and giant resists going deeper than giants just popping up in human culture and being redily accepted and put to work building stuff for us.  Even when I ask questions about what the construction industry would be like I run into trouble.  Sure having giants around would obviate the need for forklifts and bulldozers for humans, but wouldn’t giants have just as much reason to use 4x forklifts for their needs?

Making the simple assumption that a 4x giant requires 4x resources, wouldn’t you have to pay one a 4x salary to match their 4x output?  Except that formual might not translate to less physical tasks.  But what if it did?  What if a giant’s 4x brain contributed 4x output?  Then how the hell do I justify them working for us?  Or them even deigning to work in harmonious equality with humans.  Why would they put up with that?

So now I’m thinking of ways to diminish giants to create a symbiotic realtionship with humans.  That just seems like a cheat.  Though it feels bubbly with tension and potential plot in the same way a teenage chemist looks at Poprocks and Coke, “That’ll do something for sure.”

Hmmmm

Day 261